<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lewis &#38; Lin LLC : Internet Law Counsel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ilawco.com/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ilawco.com</link>
	<description>Serving Clients in Internet Law, Domain Name Law, Trademarks, Copyright, Licensing and Litigation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 17:22:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Lewis &amp; Lin Obtains Dismissal of Case Against Major Internet Daily Deal Retailer</title>
		<link>http://www.ilawco.com/blog/lewis-lin-obtains-dismissal-of-case-against-major-internet-daily-deal-retailer.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.ilawco.com/blog/lewis-lin-obtains-dismissal-of-case-against-major-internet-daily-deal-retailer.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 17:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commercial Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E-Commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lewis & Lin News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ilawco.com/?p=1097</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lewis &#38; Lin secured a victory for our client today in a case involving an e-commerce site’s liability for misdirected goods.  Plaintiff sued our client, a top five Internet daily deal site, for damages resulting from the loss of a shipment of $200,000 worth of flat screen TVs. Lewis &#38; Lin filed a motion to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ilawco.com/blog/lewis-lin-obtains-dismissal-of-case-against-major-internet-daily-deal-retailer.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lewis &amp; Lin Defends Smartrend.com Domain in Business Dispute</title>
		<link>http://www.ilawco.com/blog/lewis-lin-defends-smartrend-udr.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.ilawco.com/blog/lewis-lin-defends-smartrend-udr.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 17:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ilawco.com/?p=1089</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lewis &#38; Lin obtained a victory in a domain name action filed against our client by Comtex News Network over the domain name &#60;Smartrend.com&#62;.  Comtex, the complainant, owned the registered trademark rights to the SMARTREND mark and operated the website hosted at &#60;MySmartrend.com&#62;.  In its complaint filed under the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP), Comtex [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ilawco.com/blog/lewis-lin-defends-smartrend-udr.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lewis &amp; Lin Defends UDRP Domain Name Claim With Laches Defense</title>
		<link>http://www.ilawco.com/blog/lewis-lin-defends-udrp-aches-defense.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.ilawco.com/blog/lewis-lin-defends-udrp-aches-defense.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 22:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain Dispute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lewis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UDRP decision]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ilawco.com/?p=1086</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lewis &#38; Lin obtained a victory in a UDRP domain name action filed against our client by Laminex, Inc., the owner of the website at &#60;IDshop.com&#62;.  The complainant owned a United States trademark registration for the ID SHOP mark, registered in 1989, and provided photography services and supplies associated with identification devices such as ID [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ilawco.com/blog/lewis-lin-defends-udrp-aches-defense.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lewis &amp; Lin Obtains $2 Million Arbitration Award in Contract Dispute Regarding Email Marketing Services</title>
		<link>http://www.ilawco.com/blog/lewis-lin-award-email-marketing-breach-of-contrac.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.ilawco.com/blog/lewis-lin-award-email-marketing-breach-of-contrac.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 19:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arbitration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breach of Contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Email Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lewis & Lin News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ilawco.com/?p=1082</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a case heard before the American Arbitration Association, Lewis &#38; Lin obtained for its client Datran Media Corp. (the predecessor to PulsePoint, Inc.) a major victory on Datran’s breach of contract claim.  Under the contract, Datran provided email marketing services to ModernAd Media LLC, with the contract renewing annually unless ModernAd provided notice of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ilawco.com/blog/lewis-lin-award-email-marketing-breach-of-contrac.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lewis &amp; Lin Successfully Defends Chick-fil-A Parody Website</title>
		<link>http://www.ilawco.com/blog/lewis-lin-defends-chick-fil-a-parody-website.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.ilawco.com/blog/lewis-lin-defends-chick-fil-a-parody-website.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 21:06:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parody]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UDRP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WIPO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ilawco.com/?p=1071</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chick-fil-A Loses Effort to Shut Down Parody Website New York Internet law firm Lewis &#38; Lin defended against Chick-fil-A’s allegations of trademark infringement. Brooklyn, New York (December 3, 2012) – Jason Selvig and Davram Stiefler, two Brooklyn-based comedians and social commentators, have won their fight to defend their parody website against Chick-fil-A, the Atlanta-based fast-food [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ilawco.com/blog/lewis-lin-defends-chick-fil-a-parody-website.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lewis &amp; Lin Obtains Fee Award in Personal Name Cybersquatting Case</title>
		<link>http://www.ilawco.com/blog/lewis-lin-obtains-fee-personal-name-cybersquatting-case.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.ilawco.com/blog/lewis-lin-obtains-fee-personal-name-cybersquatting-case.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 22:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cybersquattting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lewis & Lin News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Name Squatting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SDNY]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ilawco.com/?p=1001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a case of first impression under 15 U.S.C. 8131 &#8212; the personal name cybersquatting provision of the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act &#8212; Lewis &#38; Lin obtained a court order awarding attorneys&#8217; fees as the prevailing party under the ACPA. Section 8131 of the ACPA imposes civil liability on &#8220;[a]ny person who registers a domain [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ilawco.com/blog/lewis-lin-obtains-fee-personal-name-cybersquatting-case.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brett Lewis Interviewed about Future of Domain Name Industry in Robbie&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.ilawco.com/blog/brett-lewis-domain-name-robbies-blog.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.ilawco.com/blog/brett-lewis-domain-name-robbies-blog.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 17:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brett E. Lewis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain Names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lewis & Lin News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ilawco.com/?p=996</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Domain Name blogger Robbie Ferguson interviewed Lewis &#38; Lin Partner Brett Lewis on the current market for domain names and the future of the industry.  Read the full interview here.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ilawco.com/blog/brett-lewis-domain-name-robbies-blog.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brett Lewis Earns Client Distinction Award</title>
		<link>http://www.ilawco.com/blog/brett-lewis-client-distinction-award.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.ilawco.com/blog/brett-lewis-client-distinction-award.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 16:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lewis & Lin News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ilawco.com/?p=986</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lewis &#38; Lin LLC member Brett E. Lewis has earned the Client Distinction Award from Martindale-Hubbell. Less than 4% of the 900,000 attorneys listed on Martindale-Hubbell have received this distinction. This honor has been made possible by Lewis &#38; Lin&#8217;s clients who have given Mr. Lewis high reviews in the following areas: ✓ Communications Ability [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ilawco.com/blog/brett-lewis-client-distinction-award.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Parody Website Spoofing Chick-fil-A Controversy Fights for Domain Name Rights</title>
		<link>http://www.ilawco.com/blog/chick-fil-a-domain-name.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.ilawco.com/blog/chick-fil-a-domain-name.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 16:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain Names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lewis & Lin News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parody]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UDRP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ilawco.com/?p=942</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The owners of chickfilafoundation.com, a parody website, have retained the domain dispute law firm Lewis &#38; Lin, LLC in New York to defend against Chick-fil-A’s allegations of trademark infringement. Brooklyn, New York (September 18, 2012) – Jason Selvig and Davram Stiefler, two Brooklyn-based comedians and political commentators, have retained the New York domain dispute law firm Lewis [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ilawco.com/blog/chick-fil-a-domain-name.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lewis &amp; Lin Wins Shocking Domain Name Dispute</title>
		<link>http://www.ilawco.com/blog/lewis-and-lin-win-shocking-domain-name-dispute.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.ilawco.com/blog/lewis-and-lin-win-shocking-domain-name-dispute.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 21:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain name attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain name attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain name dispute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain name disputes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain Names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UDRP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UDRP decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UDRP dispute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WIPO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ilawco.com/?p=934</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week, a unanimous three-member panel of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) held in a domain name dispute that the owner of Shocking.com had legitimate rights to the domain name &#60;Shocking.com&#62;, based on its long-term use in connection with an ISP. See Interbasic Holding, S.A. v. Shocking, No. D2012-0654 (June 7, 2012).  The dispute involved [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ilawco.com/blog/lewis-and-lin-win-shocking-domain-name-dispute.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
